Deck Help Requests

{"ops":[{"insert":"This deck use the Witch-king as annoying presence on the board and a little Voltron, while I build the graveyard and reanimate things. (see description)\n\n"}]}

{"ops":[{"insert":"I'd like to stay in the Bracket 3 at most and I'd like to add LOTR flavour to the deck without compromising it. I see there are a lot of Amass cards I don't use (some of them are in the Maybeboard). I play Fell-beast just for flavour without much efficiency. I think I can get things better but I dont know how.\n"}]}

{"ops":[{"insert":"trying to win via lifedrain/aristocrat and/or go wide and then pump with "},{"insert":{"card-link":"Pippin, Warden of Isengard"}},{"insert":" "},{"insert":{"card-link":"Motivated Pony"}},{"insert":" and ( "},{"insert":{"card-link":"Blossoming Bogbeast"}},{"insert":" )?\n"}]}

{"ops":[{"insert":"Feels like it is not consistent enough. Don't know if I should cut cards like "},{"insert":{"card-link":"Warren Soultrader"}},{"insert":" ,"},{"insert":{"card-link":"Ygra, Eater of All"}},{"insert":" , "},{"insert":{"card-link":"Gourmand's Talent"}},{"insert":" and "},{"insert":{"card-link":"Luminous Broodmoth"}},{"insert":" or any others in favour of better ones that fit the deck. I feel like warren,ygra and gourmand is there only for some 3 card combo's but it's pretty hard to pull off without tutors, or the card draw I have, I think? Though there are alot of 3 card combo's I can do. Maybe "},{"insert":{"card-link":"Inspiring Leader"}},{"insert":" also isn't that great since I only make creature tokens with "},{"insert":{"card-link":"Merry, Warden of Isengard"}},{"insert":" . I was thinking of putting in cards like "},{"insert":{"card-link":"Call of the Ring"}},{"insert":" , "},{"insert":{"card-link":"Lobelia, Defender of Bag End"}},{"insert":" , "},{"insert":{"card-link":"Sting, the Glinting Dagger"}},{"insert":" , "},{"insert":{"card-link":"Vat of Rebirth"}},{"insert":" ... I filled the maybeboard with cards I might wanna get. Open for new suggestions! and especially what should I take out and what do I put in? Thanks in advance!\n\nDo keep budget in mind cards cannot cost more than +/= €10\n"}]}

{"ops":[{"insert":"Deck is trying to win by having opponents creatures enter tapped\n"}]}

{"ops":[{"insert":"I feel like I don't have big creatures that I can defend with and no way to answer other opponents casts\n"}]}

{"ops":[{"insert":"This deck is trying to copy Marit Lage tokens and make them deal unblockable damage\n"}]}

{"ops":[{"insert":"I don't think this deck is running enough interaction and probably needs more card draw. I need cut and card recommendations and advice in general would be greatly appreciated. \n"}]}

{"ops":[{"insert":"built this deck from the bottom up around meld and similar mechanics, partner with being the very last. (cards that dont do much if anything without their counterpart)\n"}]}

{"ops":[{"insert":" and honestly i wouldnt mind replacing partners, but it needs something to do when all of the other inconsistent pieces arent found. seven dwarves are too slow and 9 wraiths felt like it was a 9 wraiths deck. have yet to be able to find something that clicks. suggestions are very welcome. thank you a ton\n"}]}

{"ops":[{"insert":"This deck is trying to put plus 1/1 on the commander then through cascade to get mana and place more creatures to get more 1/1 to in the end to cheat in colourless creatures for free or reduced mana.\n"}]}

{"ops":[{"insert":"I need card recommendations and what card i can substitute.\n"}]}

{"ops":[{"insert":"This commander seems better for spell slinging but the goal is to use the free mana from "},{"insert":{"card-link":"Karolina Dean, Runaway"}},{"insert":" and get big, oppressive creatures out quick. "},{"insert":{"card-link":"Tannuk, Steadfast Second"}},{"insert":", "},{"insert":{"card-link":"Kellan, the Kid"}},{"insert":" and various cascade/top deck triggers also help cheat creatures out. For this reason I've tried to make sure the creatures in question have at least red in their mana cost so there's more synergy to be warped. There are a few exceptions to this, those being "},{"insert":{"card-link":"Maelstrom Wanderer"}},{"insert":", "},{"insert":{"card-link":"Apex Devastator"}},{"insert":", and "},{"insert":{"card-link":"Hullbreaker Horror"}},{"insert":". Ideally this deck is moreso red+ than it is WUBRG, but of course it dips into every color. The goal is a high bracket 2, low bracket 3 deck. Gamble is the only game changer in the deck for a little more consistency and some \"wild magic\" flavor, otherwise I'm not particularly interested in tutors (nor am I interested in combos).\n\nAlso for fun, I wanted to avoid using "},{"insert":{"card-link":"Sol Ring"}},{"insert":".\n"}]}

{"ops":[{"insert":"The deck has trouble being consistent and finding a balance of big cost spells. Still unsure how many is too many or if there aren't enough to benefit from things like cascade. While this deck has been fun every time I've played it, it's yet to win a game. It seems despite getting big creatures out pretty quickly after turn 4, it's still hard to close things out. For one reason or another swinging with a bunch of strong creatures isn't enough, or the creatures I play don't make enough of an impact to the game. I'd like to see if there's a more refined wincon out there and if perhaps better creatures to play.\n"}]}

{"ops":[{"insert":"This is a casual "},{"insert":{"card-link":"Taii Wakeen, Perfect Shot"}},{"insert":" spellslinger/burn deck built around precision creature damage, cast triggers, mana/Treasure generation, and a small but fun ("},{"attributes":{"italic":true},"insert":" to me :)"},{"insert":" ) coin-flip package.\n\nThe early game establishes mana, card selection, tutors, and cheap engines. In the midgame I want to land spellslinger/resource enginse and then chain cheap burn spells. Cards like "},{"insert":{"card-link":"Coruscation Mage"}},{"insert":", "},{"insert":{"card-link":"Kessig Flamebreather"}},{"insert":", "},{"insert":{"card-link":"Longshot, Rebel Bowman"}},{"insert":", "},{"insert":{"card-link":"Birgi, God of Storytelling // Harnfel, Horn of Bounty"}},{"insert":", "},{"insert":{"card-link":"Electro, Assaulting Battery"}},{"insert":", and "},{"insert":{"card-link":"Urabrask // The Great Work"}},{"insert":" turn those casts into damage and/or additional resources, while Taii rewards controlling the board.\n\n"},{"insert":{"card-link":"Krark, the Thumbless"}},{"insert":" + "},{"insert":{"card-link":"Krark's Thumb"}},{"insert":"/"},{"insert":{"card-link":"Tavern Scoundrel"}},{"insert":" is a secondary package rather than the deck’s entire strategy. Tutors ("},{"attributes":{"italic":true},"insert":"hopefully"},{"insert":") help the small package remain accessible without filling the deck with weak coin-flip cards.\n\nThe deck eventually converts accumulated mana, Treasures, spell copies, and burn into lethal turns through cards such as "},{"insert":{"card-link":"Mana Clash"}},{"insert":", "},{"insert":{"card-link":"Aurelia's Fury"}},{"insert":", "},{"insert":{"card-link":"Repercussion"}},{"insert":" interactions, "},{"insert":{"card-link":"Underworld Breach"}},{"insert":" lines, and other overlapping engines. \n"}]}

{"ops":[{"insert":"I’m making the final cuts and looking for feedback on overall deck architecture rather than simply identifying individually weak cards. I want this optimized for medium-power(?) Bracket 4 four-player Commander without turning it into generic Boros goodstuff or cEDH. I exclusively play within a friendly pod so my goal is to build something capable of meaningfully competing at their level (around medium-power Bracket 4) without necessarily pushing the deck toward "},{"attributes":{"italic":true},"insert":"maximum"},{"insert":" optimization but as synergistic and fun to play as I can get.\n\nIn particular, I’m trying to determine whether my ratios of cheap burn/spell fuel, cast-damage payoffs, mana/resource engines, card advantage, tutors, interaction, protection, and finishers are balanced(?). Additionally, things like:\n\nWhether "},{"attributes":{"bold":true},"insert":"6 tutors"},{"insert":" is excessive or justified by the small packages/toolbox"},{"attributes":{"list":"bullet"},"insert":"\n"},{"insert":"Whether the deck has enough "},{"attributes":{"bold":true},"insert":"draw/card velocity"},{"insert":" to sustain multi-spell turns and rebuild after disruption."},{"attributes":{"list":"bullet"},"insert":"\n"},{"insert":"Whether I have the right balance between "},{"attributes":{"bold":true},"insert":"cheap spells and spellslinger payoffs"},{"insert":"; I don't want hands full of payoffs with nothing to cast, but I also don't want to cut so many payoffs that the spellslinger-burn engine stops functioning."},{"attributes":{"list":"bullet"},"insert":"\n"}]}

{"ops":[{"insert":"This deck is trying to win by casting instant and sorcery spells to increase counters on Mizzix, net infinite mana, and drop a pay x kill spell. Using a combination of recursion, spell copy, and mana-positive spells, I quickly build counters on Mizzix, delve through my library to find the cards that I need, and drop a large Pay X kill spell utilizing Mizzix's cost reduction. \n"}]}

{"ops":[{"insert":"This deck sometimes feels like a slow build or that it hits a mana slump early until Mizzix is more active with protection. If I don't have the mana and can't prioritize putting out a creature that builds tokens, this also leaves me open to attack. There are several infinite mana combos present in the deck, but it feels like putting the pieces in place takes more time than necessary. \n"}]}