danaroach {"ops":[{"insert":"Hello, and welcome to September's Archidekt Deckbuilding Contest.\n\nThis is a monthly contest with a different theme each month. The goal is to build a Commander-legal deck that fulfills the prompt in a creative or unique fashion, and at the end of each month, three finalists will be selected for you to vote on. Whoever gets the most votes will be crowned the winner, although all three finalists will receive a prize.\n\n"},{"attributes":{"bold":true},"insert":"September's challenge is to brew a creative and interesting Commander-legal Typal/Kindred deck where the commander supports the creature type in an interesting and creative way despite not being of that type, nor using that creature type in its text box."},{"insert":"\n\nTypal/Kindred has existed as a concept since Alpha, with "},{"attributes":{"link":"https://edhrec.com/cards/goblin-king"},"insert":"Goblin King"},{"insert":", "},{"attributes":{"link":"https://edhrec.com/cards/lord-of-atlantis"},"insert":"Lord of Atlantis"},{"insert":" and "},{"attributes":{"link":"https://edhrec.com/cards/zombie-master"},"insert":"Zombie Master"},{"insert":" buffing their respective creature types. Flash forward to today and we see support for types as diverse as Unicorns in commanders such as "},{"attributes":{"link":"https://edhrec.com/commanders/thurid-mare-of-destiny"},"insert":"Thurid, Mare of Destiny"},{"insert":".\n\nWhat’s the Contest All About?"},{"attributes":{"header":2},"insert":"\n"},{"insert":"\nWorking within the parameters of the provided prompt, construct a deck list with your own creative and compelling spin. Three chosen finalists will be awarded "},{"attributes":{"link":"https://www.cardsphere.com/?utm_source=edhrec"},"insert":"store credit to use on Cardsphere"},{"insert":".\n\nFor September's deckbuilding contest: "},{"attributes":{"bold":true},"insert":" brew a creative and interesting Commander-legal Typal/Kindred deck where the commander supports the creature type in an interesting and creative way despite not being of that type, nor using that creature type in its text box"},{"insert":". Decks will be judged on the creativity and originality of their brew. \n\nFor example, "},{"attributes":{"link":"https://edhrec.com/commanders/vela-the-night-clad"},"insert":"Vela the Night-Clad"},{"insert":" was originally released back in Planechase 2012. The intent was for her to support a Ninja deck, since she deals damage to each opponent when a creature you control leaves the battlefield, something that interacts nicely with the Ninjitsu mechanic. Since this was the intent of Vela when released, a Vela Ninja deck wouldn't fulfill the creative and interesting portion of the contest requirement, but it's an excellent example of a Commander that supports a particular creature type despite not being that type or having it in the card text.\n\nAs we noted in previous contests, we have so far been very forgiving regarding picking finalists with meager deck descriptions, but moving forward we're going to be a lot more discerning. Every month this contest gets larger, and that makes sorting through entries more and more of a time commitment. If you don't have a decent description, we're going to find ourselves a lot less willing to try to connect those dots, because we simply cannot do so.\n\nHow to Participate"},{"attributes":{"header":2},"insert":"\n"},{"insert":"\nBrew a Commander-legal deck on "},{"attributes":{"link":"https://archidekt.com/?utm_source=edhrec"},"insert":"Archidekt"},{"insert":" that satisfies the prompt."},{"attributes":{"list":"ordered"},"insert":"\n"},{"insert":"Any unreleased cards spoiled during the contest’s duration are allowed."},{"attributes":{"list":"ordered"},"insert":"\n"},{"insert":"Silver-bordered and acorn cards, while fun, are not allowed."},{"attributes":{"list":"ordered"},"insert":"\n"},{"insert":"Digital-only cards (such as those designed for the Alchemy format on Arena) are also not allowed."},{"attributes":{"list":"ordered"},"insert":"\n"},{"insert":"Strictly one deck submitted per user."},{"attributes":{"list":"ordered"},"insert":"\n"},{"insert":"\nA couple months ago, we also revamped the submission process. Decks must now be submitted on Archidekt via a button on the newspost. This will make it easier to view all submissions in a single place. Additionally, it will simplify the process of writing a description by sharing the same text on the submission page and the deck page itself.\n\nThere's also a new, easy-to-remember landing page for anything contest-related, found at "},{"attributes":{"link":"https://archidekt.com/contest?utm_source=edhrec"},"insert":"archidekt.com/contest"},{"insert":".\n\nYou can also comment on individual decks directly from the submission, making those discussions easier to find and track later.\n\nTo submit a deck, select the orange button labeled \"Submit a deck to this contest\" and follow the form prompt. Submissions are accepted until 9:00 p.m. EDT (UTC -4) on "},{"attributes":{"bold":true},"insert":"Wednesday, September 9, 2026."},{"insert":"\n\nOnly one submission per user! If you change your mind and want to submit a different deck before submissions close, you may do so by first deleting your submission. To edit your description, you can do so from the deck page itself.\n\nFrom the eligible submissions, we'll select three finalists with lists that we believe best embody the spirit of the prompt. Deck descriptions are now required, and the more detailed the description the better; we just have too many submissions to try to put together what your deck is doing without some commentary and context.\n\nOn "},{"attributes":{"bold":true},"insert":"Wednesday, September 16, 2026"},{"insert":", we’ll announce three finalists via the Archidekt Discord and an article on EDHREC highlighting each deck.\n\n"},{"attributes":{"link":"https://www.cardsphere.com/sets?utm_source=edhrec"},"insert":"Each finalist will be awarded credit to use on Cardsphere"},{"insert":". The value of the credit is in US dollars and depends on the finalist's placement in deck upvotes at the end of the week-long polling period:\n\n1st Place Prize - $250\n2nd Place Prize - $150\n3rd Place Prize - $100\n\nFinalists will be contacted via email regarding their winnings within roughly 24 hours, following the conclusion of voting on "},{"attributes":{"bold":true},"insert":"Wednesday, September 23, 2026"},{"insert":".\n\nPlease note, you must have a Cardsphere account in order to receive your winnings. It's quick and free — "},{"attributes":{"link":"https://www.cardsphere.com/signup?referrer=archidekt_contest&utm_source=edhrec"},"insert":"register here"},{"insert":" if you don't have an account already!\n\nHere are the "},{"attributes":{"link":"https://archidekt.com/contestRules?utm_source=edhrec"},"insert":"official contest rules"},{"insert":". If you have any questions, feel free to ask here, or join the Archidekt "},{"attributes":{"link":"https://discord.gg/sctEc9Ru36?utm_source=edhrec"},"insert":"public Discord server."},{"insert":" We look forward to seeing what you all come up with!\n"}]}
Edited 9/10/2026, 1:00:09 AM
18
{"ops":[{"insert":"First thank you and your staff for doing this each month! It is very fun to not only brew for these but to see how the community responds. Do ya'll really look at each submission? If so that's impressive as indeed it has been getting bigger and more popular. Again thanks for all ya'll do and happy Friday\n"}]}
8
{"ops":[{"insert":"We do really look at each submission, and it is indeed a bit of a time sink. Some go faster than other, though. There's some amount of decks that we can just kind of skip over though because the brewer didn't write a description or follow the prompt. Last month for example there were some percentage of decks who were using commanders that weren't from the Mystery Booster Commander Edition, so you can skip those too, etc. But by and large we're reading 95% of them.\n"}]}
7
{"ops":[{"insert":"647 submissions last time I checked, man good luck with all of those. The prompt was really fun on this one, I had a blast building mine :) \n"}]}
3
{"ops":[{"insert":"Would a party deck work if the commander is a member of the party?\n"}]}
1
{"ops":[{"insert":"Our first concern is going to be that the deck is interesting and unique.\n"}]}
1
{"ops":[{"insert":"Can we use a commander that has Changeling and have it still fall within the theme for this month?\n"}]}
1
{"ops":[{"insert":"Yes, but I'm not sure anyone judging is going to find an Ur-Dragon deck with changelings creative enough to get votes, etc.\n"}]}
0
{"ops":[{"insert":"Hi! I was playing around with the idea of finding an overlap between two creature types (i.e. Soldiers and Humans) and building a deck helmed by a commander who directly supports one type while the deck's synergies completely ignore it and only focus on the other. So it would for example be a Solider typal deck helmed by a human typal commander. All the Soldiers in it just also happen to be humans.\nWould that work for this contest or is it too close to just a normal typal deck?\n"}]}
Edited 9/4/2026, 11:08:22 PM
0
{"ops":[{"insert":"So the rules say the commander has to support the typal/kindred type selected. Can it work in reverse where its the typal/kindred type that supports the commander?\n"}]}
0
{"ops":[{"insert":"Hi! Would a \"mechanic\" typal deck fit the theme for this contest? For example, a flyers deck led by a commander without flying or mentioning flying within the text box.\n"}]}
0
{"ops":[{"insert":"I really hope people like the goofy deck I built, even if I kind of took an easy route. \n"}]}
0
{"ops":[{"insert":"Okay, important question--would a deck centered around thallids count as fungi or saprolings for the purposes of the contest? They're all fungi, but the more important bit is the saprolings they make\n"}]}
0
{"ops":[{"insert":"Should be fine. Our first concern is going to be that the deck is interesting and unique.\n"}]}
1
{"ops":[{"insert":"would garth one-eye be legal for dragons? He technically only references a card name not the type dragon.\n"}]}
0
{"ops":[{"insert":"That should be fine. Our first concern is going to be that the deck is interesting and unique.\n"}]}
0
{"ops":[{"insert":"Can we get clarification on what constitutes \"Typal/Kindred\"?\n\nIs it \"All creatures of type\" or \"Minimum # of creatures of type\" or \"% of creatures of type\"?\n"}]}
0
{"ops":[{"insert":"To paraphrase Bill Clinton, we know it when we see it. Our first concern is going to be that the deck is interesting and unique.\n"}]}
0
{"ops":[{"insert":"By my count there are 3 so far already! No the true winner by amount of submissions is "},{"insert":{"card-link":"Elda, Conjurer of Spectacle"}},{"insert":" Slivers. I will up the ante and say 10% of all submissions will be some variant of this.\n"}]}
0
{"ops":[{"insert":"If you think the judges are doing to look at a deck with 32 board wipes and think it looks interesting and creative, then you're more than welcome to submit the deck and make a case for why it should count in the description field.\n"}]}
4
{"ops":[{"insert":"Would using cards like Conspiracy or Arcane Adaptation be considered cheating?\n"}]}
0
{"ops":[{"insert":"I don't think anyone judging is going to call anything anyone does cheating. We just want the deck to be creative and cool.\n"}]}
2