Jeremy 5 years{"ops":[{"insert":"It appears that cards that \"contain\" multiple cards are considered additively as far as CMC is concerned. For instance, "},{"insert":{"card-link":"Fire // Ice"}},{"insert":" is placed on the CMC histogram as a 4 CMC multicolor card. I'm not exactly sure what the correct way to represent such as card is, but I don't think this is it. Maybe having such cards separated makes the most sense (so Fire // Ice would be a 2 CMC blue card and a 2 CMC red card), but I'm not sure how easy that is to do from a coding perspective since you obviously wouldn't want this done with flip cards. Thoughts? \n"}]}
Edited 2/9/2019, 4:43:56 PM
0
andy 5 years{"ops":[{"insert":"Yeah, right now it's going by the \"official\" cmc of the card which is the addition of the two halves according to the rules. That being said I would agree that doesn't make much sense for the cmc graph. We were going to be reworking that to give the user some options in the future so we'll look into splitting up split cards then. Thanks!\n"}]}
2