Syraxwastaken {"ops":[{"insert":"Currently, "},{"insert":{"card-link":"Tolabow, Loch Rascal"}},{"insert":" does not function correctly on archidekt. The color identity of the commander is blue, but a deck with it as the commander can be WU. UB. UR. or UG as well as having any color of basic lands.\nshown in the image below, gaia's cradle is \"not legal\" in this WIP bracket 3 UG Tolabow deck, which is a weird bug because i can include other green cards just fine\n"},{"insert":{"image":"https://i.imgur.com/HZpqjXd.png"}},{"insert":"\ntherefor, i would like to propose a color selection menu to force a specific color identity in a deck. This would not only help this deck in specific, but also the jank that comes with using the partner & choose a background commanders that can be any color.\n"}]}
0
{"ops":[{"insert":"There may be bugs in the "},{"insert":{"card-link":"Tolabow, Loch Rascal"}},{"insert":" legality checker, but not for what you're describing. \n\nTolabow can only run an extra color for instant and sorcery spells. It doesn't just update the entire color identity of the deck. The deck is figuring out the extra color for you, which it's doing correctly by allowing green instant or sorceries. \n\n"},{"insert":{"card-link":"Gaea's Cradle"}},{"insert":" has a green color identity, isn't an instant or sorcery, and isn't a basic land, so it cannot be played in a Tolabow deck. \n\n(I'm not 1000% on the Tolabow rules since they get weird with the difference between color and color identity, but I'm fairly on this) \n"}]}
2