Alderan 4 years{"ops":[{"insert":"Hello,\nWhen searching for users submitted decks only the cards I don't have in collection (0 cards in collection) are marked as \"Not owned\". If I have 1, 2 or 3 copies of the cards in my collection they are all marked as \"Owned\" even if the decks needs 4 copies of them.\nJust for example, in the deck \"UWBlink STD22\" submitted today, the 4 \"Deserted Beach\" cards are marked with the green flag even if I have only 1 copy in my collection, same for the 4 \"Fateful Absence\" cards, the 4 \"Jwari Disruption\" cards are marked with the green flag even if I have 3 copies in my collection and so on. Only the 4 \"Spectral Adversary\" cards (I don't have this card in my collection) don't have any flag and are marked as \"Not owned\".\n\nRegards\n"}]}
0
Jeremy(Archidekt Moderator)
4 years{"ops":[{"insert":"This is the intended behavior of the feature at this time. We intentionally did not want to make it so you couldn't see that you owned at least one copy of a card. It's certainly possible we need another color stripe besides green or blue to indicate that you own the card, but not enough copies of it. The question then is, do we make yet another tag to indicate that you own a different edition of a card in the deck (the blue stripe, currently), but not enough copies of that? At that point, we'd have 4 or more color stripes to indicate collection ownership which may prove too complex to be intuitive to users. It's a bit of a dilemma we've gone back and forth on, but certainly appreciate user input on the matter! \n"}]}
0
Alderan 4 years{"ops":[{"insert":"Thank for the fast reply, Jeremy\n\nMaybe, instead of colored stripes, the cards could be marked this way, regardless of their edition\n\nDeserted Beach 1/4 \nFateful Absence 1/4 \nJwari Disruption 3/4 \nSpectral Adversary 0/4 \n\nand so on\n\nI don't know if this is possible or too complicated to implement but this way you could know at a glance which cards you need to complete a deck.\n\nBest regards\n"}]}
0