Cheapest card version available

{"ops":[{"insert":"To elaborate on this, is it possible to make the default version of the WAR Planeswalkers in the search not appear as the JP prints? It’s difficult to go through and try to figure out what works well in a deck when the “most recent” card displayed is either the JP WAR promo. This issue also occurs with cards most recently printed in Salvat 2005, interestingly. Perhaps a preferred language setting for the profile settings could be used so search results default to EN printings instead of other printings, then you can refine from there if you have the super neat Russian Foil version of "},{"insert":{"card-link":"Foil"}},{"insert":"?\n"}]}

{"ops":[{"insert":"also if you could add cross website auto cheapest way to buy with factored shipping that would be amazing though i understand the challenges\n"}]}

{"ops":[{"insert":"How after 4 years is this still not implemented..\n"}]}

{"ops":[{"insert":"Just added Impact Tremors to a deck and it defaulted to the $10 promo version instead of the $3 DTK printing. This is the biggest accessibility issue I've found on archidekt and makes me consider switching. It takes way more inputs (repetitive strain injury) to get an accurate look at my deck's cost, and that's the first thing I look at when deciding if a card goes in or not. You can't choose the printing from the sidebar, so you have to add to deck, navigate to the card window and then look through the printings to even see if there's a cheaper printing, and there often is. It's also just frustrating for all budget builders! Please consider adding some more parameters to the search function. Thanks for your hard work and the awesome site <3\n"}]}

{"ops":[{"insert":"Actually I would love to be able to just turn off the default adding of promos and alt art when deck-building from scratch, it makes generating a deck list to put into cardmarket really timeconsuming - for example I just searched Opt which is showing the SMA Japanese alternate art as the default so you can't actually spot it in the search list XD Similarly the basic lands have all defaulted to full art! I'd much rather make the decision myself to 'bling up' a deck's cards rather than having to reverse all the bling every time.\n"}]}

{"ops":[{"insert":"The one that I think is applying to everyone's deck is the commander collection black sol ring which won't release for more than 3 months but is TECHNICALLY the most recently announced version of sol ring. \n"}]}

{"ops":[{"insert":"Thank you! Did you see my other post about lands and "},{"insert":{"card-link":"Everflowing Chalice"}},{"insert":"?\n"}]}

{"ops":[{"insert":{"card-link":"God-Eternal Kefnet"}},{"insert":" started as the comic-con which is +$50 instead of the $3 war of the spark one.\n"}]}

{"ops":[{"insert":"I have wished this before to it would be great\n"}]}

{"ops":[{"insert":"Just another upvoting this. I have recently joined a budget league and archidekt is the organizer's price check of choice. It's a huge pain in the ass hunting down every card I know is 0.10 but has been bumped up to 0.50 or more because Archidekt doesn't include this basic feature. You would think it should default to cheapest because if I want a cool art, I already know what special sets those come from. However, I can only compare prices within this system by clicking back and forth on the versions, and you move whatever I've clicked to the top of the list. Incredibly annoying and unintuitive.\n"}]}

{"ops":[{"insert":"There's also a bug with Lightning Bolt where the foil version of the Magic Fest promo is crazy expensive in the CK price but in CK it doesn't show up with that price\n"}]}